In-Situ vs. Center-Based Simulation in Surgical Training

In the ever-evolving landscape of medical education, the quest for innovative and effective training methods is unceasing. Two prominent approaches have emerged, each with its own unique advantages and applications: in-situ simulation training and center-based simulation training. These techniques have revolutionized the way healthcare professionals are trained and prepared for real-life clinical scenarios, ultimately enhancing patient safety and the quality of care. In this comprehensive guide, let’s accompany UpSurgeOn to delve into the depths of these two simulation methods, exploring their fundamental differences, benefits, and applications in surgical training.

I. In-Situ Simulation in Surgical Training

In-situ simulation training is a groundbreaking concept that encompasses a distinct training methodology. This approach involves conducting simulations within the very confines of the clinical environment, where healthcare providers actively perform their day-to-day duties. The beauty of in-situ simulation training lies in its authenticity; it mirrors the exact clinical setting where healthcare professionals work, making it a powerful tool for surgical training and skill enhancement [1 – 3]. 

1.1. The Core Elements of In-Situ Simulation training

In-situ simulation training thrives on the participation of on-duty clinical providers during their actual workdays. This means that healthcare professionals are not taken away from their real responsibilities but rather engage in training exercises seamlessly integrated into their workflow. This approach ensures that training objectives align closely with the realities of patient care, making it highly effective.

The versatility of in-situ simulation training extends to its ability to be implemented regardless of whether participants are actively engaging in simulations while caring for actual patients. This dual-definition approach emphasizes the adaptability of in-situ simulation as it caters to the dynamic and often unpredictable nature of healthcare settings. [1 – 3]

1.2. The Benefits of In-Situ Simulation training

In-situ simulation training is more than just a surgical training method; it’s a catalyst for holistic improvement in healthcare. Here are some of the key advantages:

• Realistic Environment: In-situ simulation training unfolds in a genuine clinical environment, making it the epitome of realism. Practicing in the same setting where healthcare professionals work enhances the transfer of skills and knowledge to real-life situations.
• Team Training: Teamwork and effective communication are pivotal in healthcare, and in-situ simulation trainingpromotes these essential skills. It provides an opportunity for interdisciplinary collaboration and fosters a culture of safety within the healthcare team.
• Organizational Learning: In-situ simulation transcends individual and team learning and extends to organizational growth. It helps in identifying systemic issues and latent safety threats, thereby facilitating process improvements and infrastructure enhancements.
• Addressing System-Wide Threats: This approach is particularly potent in identifying and mitigating potential risks and hazards within the clinical setting. It plays a pivotal role in enhancing patient safety by proactively addressing system-wide threats.
• Cost and Convenience: In-situ simulation training eliminates the need for healthcare professionals to travel to dedicated simulation centers, reducing costs and logistical challenges. It can be conducted during regular working hours, minimizing disruptions to clinical duties.
• Improved patient outcomes: Incorporating in-situ simulation training into medical training holds immense promise for enhancing patient outcomes through the development of surgical teams’ skills and performance. Extensive research has demonstrated that this immersive approach can significantly enhance team dynamics, communication, and leadership during critical resuscitation scenarios, ultimately resulting in superior patient care. [4 – 7]

Understanding the importance of meeting the needs of academic institutions in enhancing the standard of education, we have created Lab-in-a-Box. This innovative solution enables you to establish a training lab within your institution, accessible round the clock. Trainees can now enhance their microsurgical skills at their convenience. To learn more about Lab-in-a-Box, please click HERE. If you’re interested, simply send us a request or get in touch with us via email at commercial@upsurgeon.com for further information.

II. Center-Based Simulation in Surgical Training

Center-based simulation, in contrast, takes place in specialized simulation centers or facilities explicitly designed for training purposes. These centers are equipped with a myriad of simulators and models that replicate real-life surgical scenarios, providing trainees with a controlled and focused learning environment. [8 – 15]

2.1. The Essence of Center-Based Simulation training

Center-based simulation training is instrumental in developing both technical and non-technical proficiencies in healthcare professionals. This approach is often structured as part of a curriculum or training program, focusing on honing skills that are vital for successful clinical practice.

One of the distinguishing features of center-based simulation training is its separation from real-life patient care. Trainees can concentrate fully on their training without the distractions and pressures of actual patient care, enabling a deeper level of skill development. [8 – 15].

2.2. The Advantages of Center-Based Simulation training

Center-based simulation training offers several advantages in surgical education and training:

• Focused learning environment: Simulation centers provide a dedicated space for simulation activities, free from distractions and interruptions commonly found in clinical settings. This allows learners to focus solely on the simulation and maximize their learning experience [16].
• Access to specialized equipment: Simulation centers are equipped with advanced technology and high-fidelity simulators that closely replicate real-life clinical scenarios. Learners have the opportunity to practice procedures and interventions using state-of-the-art equipment, enhancing their technical skills and familiarity with medical devices [16] [17].
• Standardized scenarios: Simulation centers can develop standardized scenarios that can be replicated consistently for multiple learners. This ensures that all learners are exposed to the same learning opportunities and can be assessed objectively based on predefined performance criteria  [16].
• Opportunity for team training: Simulation centers facilitate team-based training, allowing healthcare professionals from different disciplines to work together in simulated scenarios. This promotes effective communication, collaboration, and teamwork skills, which are crucial in delivering safe and coordinated patient care [16] [18].
• Safe learning environment: Simulation centers provide a safe environment for learners to practice and make mistakes without compromising patient safety. Learners can gain confidence, improve their decision-making skills, and learn from errors in a controlled setting before applying their knowledge and skills in real patient care settings [16] [18].
• Opportunity for debriefing: Simulation centers often include dedicated debriefing rooms where learners can reflect on their performance and receive feedback from instructors and peers. Debriefing sessions are essential for enhancing learning, identifying areas for improvement, and promoting self-reflection [18].

Overall, center-based simulation training provides a controlled and immersive learning environment with access to specialized equipment, standardized scenarios, and opportunities for deliberate practice and team training. These advantages contribute to the effectiveness of simulation-based medical education. [16 – 18]

III. The Difference Between In-Situ Simulation and Center-Based Simulation training

In the realm of medical education, understanding the distinction between in-situ simulation and center-based simulation training is crucial. While both approaches have their merits, they serve different purposes and offer unique benefits.

In-situ simulation training brings training to the heart of clinical practice, aligning closely with the real work of healthcare providers. This proximity to the actual work environment increases the likelihood of achieving specific training objectives and offers a unique opportunity to address system-wide or environmental threats.

On the other hand, center-based simulation training provides a controlled and focused learning environment that is removed from the distractions and pressures of patient care. It is particularly effective for structured skill development and individual and team training [2] [16] [18] [19].

IV. Choosing the Right Simulation Method

Selecting the appropriate simulation training method is pivotal for enhancing skills and improving patient care. Both in-situ simulation and center-based simulation training have their places in medical education, and the choice depends on the specific goals and circumstances.

If you seek a realistic and context-specific training experience that aligns closely with the clinical environment, in-situ simulation training is the way to go. It not only prepares healthcare professionals for real-life scenarios but also aids in organizational learning and addresses system-wide threats.

On the other hand, if you’re looking for a controlled and focused learning environment that concentrates on skill development, center-based simulation training is the answer. It offers a structured platform for honing technical and non-technical proficiencies. UpSurgeOn is here to support you in organizing your own course or attending one of ours.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the realms of in-situ simulation and center-based simulation hold immense significance in shaping the future of medical education. By understanding their unique benefits and practical applications, medical professionals can make informed choices to enhance expertise, improve patient care, and contribute to the overall advancement of healthcare. UpSurgeOn stands as a reliable partner on this transformative path, offering innovative simulation tools and training programs that contribute to the proficiency of neurosurgeons. Our mission is to equip you with the knowledge necessary to make well-informed decisions in the field of surgery. Let’s dive deeper into the realm of surgical simulation with UpSurgeOn and elevate your training through our state-of-the-art simulations. Embark on this transformative journey today and unlock the secrets of your surgical evolution.

References: 

1. Owei, L., Neylan, C. J., Rao, R., Caskey, R. C., Morris, J. B., Sensenig, R., Brooks, A. D., Dempsey, D. T., Williams, N. N., Atkins, J. H., Baranov, D., & Dumon, K. R. (2017). In Situ Operating Room–Based Simulation: A review. Journal of Surgical Education, 74(4), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.001
2. Patterson, M. D. (2008, August 1). In situ Simulation: challenges and results. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools) – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43682/
3. Montauban, P., Balakumar, C., Rait, J., Zarsadias, P., Iqbal, S., Aravind, B., Shrestha, A. L., Fernandes, R., Shah, A., Basnyat, P., Harinath, G., Basu, S., Featherstone, B., Adams, L., Merh, R., Nikolaou, S., Abdel-Rahim, A. M., Mangam, S., Sebastian, J., . . . Dmitrowicz, A. (2021). The important role of in-situ simulation in preparing surgeons for the COVID-19 pandemic. The Surgeon, 19(5), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.08.013
4. Martin, A., Cross, S., & Attoe, C. (2020). <p>The Use of in situ Simulation in Healthcare Education: Current Perspectives</p> Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Volume 11, 893–903. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s188258
5. Dunnell, L., Barnard, A. N., Chu, K., Barling, A., Birns, J., & Walker, G. (2023). In situ simulation training for frailty. Geriatrics, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics8010026
6. Kalnow, A., Davis, A., Hampton, Z., & Gable, B. (2021). In situ simulation to promote residents as resuscitation leaders. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14449
7. Setup and Execution of In Situ Simulation. (2023, January 1). PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31869121/
8. Evgeniou, E., & Loizou, P. (2012). Simulation-based surgical education. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 83(9), 619–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06315.x
9. Lu, J., Cuff, R., & Mansour, M. A. (2021). Simulation in surgical education. The American Journal of Surgery, 221(3), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.016
10. Bréaud, J., Chevallier, D., Benizri, E., Fournier, J., Carlès, M., Delotte, J., Vénissac, N., Myx, A., Ianelli, A., Levraut, J., Jones, D. G., & Benchimol, D. (2012). The place of simulation in the surgical resident curriculum. The pedagogic program of the Nice Medical School simulation center. Journal of Visceral Surgery, 149(1), e52–e60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.12.007
11. Pandey, V., & Wolfe, J. H. (2012). Expanding the use of simulation in open vascular surgical training. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 56(3), 847–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.04.015
12. Marr, M., Hemmert, K. C., Nguyen, A. H., Combs, R., Annamalai, A., Miller, G., Pachter, H. L., Turner, J., Rifkind, K., & Cohen, S. M. (2012). Team Play in Surgical Education: A Simulation-Based Study. Journal of Surgical Education, 69(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.002
13. Cardoso, S., Suyambu, J., Iqbal, J., Jaimes, D., Amin, A., Sikto, J. T., Valderrama, M. J., Aulakh, S. S., Ramana, V., Shaukat, B., & Patel, T. (2023). Exploring the role of simulation training in improving surgical skills among residents: A Narrative review. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44654
14. Singh, A. (2018). Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology – Pros and cons. Indian Journal of Urology, 34(4), 245. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_213_18
15. Stefanidis, D., Sevdalis, N., Paige, J. T., Zevin, B., Aggarwal, R., Grantcharov, T., & Jones, D. B. (2015). Simulation in surgery. Annals of Surgery, 261(5), 846–853. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000826
16. Sørensen, J. L., Østergaard, D., LeBlanc, V. R., Ottesen, B., Konge, L., Dieckmann, P., & Van Der Vleuten, C. (2017). Design of simulation-based medical education and advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation versus off-site simulation. BMC Medical Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0838-3
17. Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Hart, I. R., Mayer, J. W., Felner, J. M., Petrusa, E., Waugh, R., Brown, D. J., Safford, R. R., Gessner, I. H., Gordon, D., & Ewy, G. A. (1999). Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA, 282(9), 861. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.9.861
18. In situ debriefing in medical simulation. (2023, January 1). PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31751066/
19. Rosen, M. A., Hunt, E. A., Pronovost, P. J., Federowicz, M. A., & Weaver, S. J. (2012). In situ simulation in Continuing Education for the Health care Professions: A Systematic review. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 32(4), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.21152